Follow new listings as they enter the directory. Source coverage counts how many of five program details are backed by official documentation. It does not rate firm quality, safety or payout reliability.
A focused reading of FTMO’s two-stage evaluation: the published objectives, a nominal $100K illustration and the conditions that need a separate check.
The two Stellar formats have different loss allowances. Compare the daily and total limits independently before deciding what the shorter evaluation path means.
A cheaper first payment can become the more expensive route. Compare the same program over one, two and three billing cycles, then add activation and reset costs.
A single strong day can raise the total profit needed to satisfy a consistency condition. Work through the denominator, account stage and reset rules before comparing percentages.
Start with the contract and execution environment. Then compare funding treatment, loss limits and payout conditions before choosing an account label or entry fee.
Start with the program you would actually trade. A large account label and an attractive profit split tell you little about its usable loss budget or total cost.
The key question is not just how much you can lose. It is whether profitable trading moves the loss floor upward, when that happens, and whether it later stops moving.
A new trading day can reset a daily calculation without restoring the account’s total loss allowance. You need to track both constraints at the same time.
The lowest displayed fee may not produce the lowest spending over your chosen evaluation period. Compare a defined scenario, not two incompatible price labels.
A profit split describes an allocation, not the entire withdrawal process. Eligibility, request timing and the account left after a payout deserve separate checks.
The instrument behind a prop account matters. Expiry and funding mechanics, trading hours and the firm’s simulation rules can all affect the comparison.