At a glance

  • Use the exact program, account size and account stage.
  • Separate a daily reference from the overall loss floor.
  • Review the source notes and current agreement before buying.
Worked exampleSelect: three separate decisions
01Consistency
Best-day share
02Maximum loss
EOD trailing
03Evaluation daily limit
None
04After passing
Flex or Daily

The evaluation condition, drawdown check and later payout policy answer different questions. Verify the selected configuration and stage.

What the Select source establishes

Tradeify’s Select guide specifies a 40% evaluation consistency requirement, an end-of-day trailing maximum loss and no daily loss limit during evaluation. It describes a 50% consistency add-on and a later choice between Flex and Daily payout policies.1

We have now recorded the evaluation daily field as “None” rather than “Not recorded” for Select. That statement is stage-specific. It does not remove the maximum-loss constraint or establish an absence of funded-stage restrictions.

An independent consistency calculation

Assume a fictional ledger with daily profits of $1,200, $800 and $500. The total is $2,500; the largest day contributes 48%. Under an assumed 40% best-day condition, the mathematical qualifying total with the best day unchanged is $1,200 ÷ 0.40 = $3,000.

The account would need $500 more net profit under those assumptions. That is a calculation, not a reason to add exposure or continue trading. If a new day exceeds $1,200, the numerator changes. Losses can also change the denominator. Check the exact definition of profit and the selected add-on.

Do not confuse the update time with enforcement

The Select guide says its end-of-day floor is still enforced in real time.1 A daily closing table therefore cannot prove that every open position remained within the limit during the session.

In a generic example, an end-of-day balance of $51,000 with a $2,000 trailing allowance produces a $49,000 floor before any lock condition. If balance later falls, a trailing floor does not ordinarily move down to restore the original gap. Use the precise program definition and lock condition when building a real account model.

The funded-policy choice is a separate comparison

The source makes the Select Flex versus Daily choice after passing and describes that choice as permanent for the account.1 Compare eligibility days, buffers, caps and daily restrictions for that later policy before assuming an evaluation rule carries over.

A label such as “Daily” does not mean every positive balance is immediately withdrawable. A useful comparison records the first eligible request, the amount eligible after the split and what remains above the enforced floor following the withdrawal.

Record the purchase version, not just the brand

The Select guide includes a legacy purchase note for the 50K target.1 Save the purchase date, exact product and dashboard version alongside any saved conditions. A current public description may not replace the original terms of an older account.

Open the Tradeify source notes for this field-scoped check. Continue with consistency arithmetic and payout conditions. Prices and the complete Growth rule set are outside this review.

Sources & dates

Primary pages accessed on . A source can change after publication. The examples above are not a claim about a program’s current price.

  1. Tradeify — Select Evaluation Accounts ↗
Promoted · QATS

Explore QATS programs

Compare QATS monthly and one-time evaluation plans. Standard fees in our reference start at $69 per month.

  • One-step evaluation
  • 80% profit split
  • Monthly or one-time fees
Explore QATS →Read QATS rulesReference snapshot; confirm current terms.

Continue your comparison

PropFirmMatcher is affiliated with QATS. This is not an independent rating or a recommendation to purchase an evaluation. Read our methodology.